Community pool spend — controls validation (C2-27)
Regen proposal #82: Live validation of Regen community-pool (x/protocolpool) spend controls, audit finding C2-27. This proposal transfers the current spendab...
Yes
7%
No
38%
Abstain
0%
Veto
55%
AI Summary
gpt-5.4-mini - generated 10/11/2026, 10:02:04 AM
Community pool spend — controls validation (C2-27)
This proposal on Regen tests community-pool spend controls by moving the current spendable community-pool balance to the proposer address for live validation. It is presented as a transparent on-chain execution with a refundable deposit, burned only if vetoed.
- Purpose is live validation of x/protocolpool spend controls tied to audit finding C2-27.
- Current spendable community-pool balance would be transferred to the proposer address for testing control behavior.
- The proposal states the deposit is refundable unless the proposal is vetoed.
- Execution is described as fully transparent and on-chain.
Voter Impact
Voters are deciding whether to approve a controlled test of community-pool spend permissions. A yes vote enables the validation transfer; a veto blocks it and can burn the deposit.
Risk Signals
- The proposal moves community-pool funds to the proposer address, which creates trust and control risk even if intended for validation.
- The exact operational safeguards and validation success criteria are not detailed here.
- If the process is vetoed, the deposit is burned; voters should weigh that consequence.
Original Proposal Text
Live validation of Regen community-pool (x/protocolpool) spend controls, audit finding C2-27. This proposal transfers the current spendable community-pool balance to the proposer address for control validation. The deposit is refundable (burned only on veto); execution is fully transparent and on-chain.